Jeremy Carr (Photo ©Tom Hyland)
Writer/director Jeremy Carr was in town recently for a showing of his first feature film Other Madnesses, which was screened at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival. The film is the story of a New York City tour guide named Ed Zimmer (James Moles) who may or may not be imagining evil deeds taking place in the immediate world around him. Reminiscent in some ways to Taxi Driver, this is a highly effective film about an individual and his private hell, stylishly directed by Carr.
I sat down with him for a one-on-one interview to learn about his experience in the movie business, the realities of making this movie and if he was influenced by the film Taxi Driver, when he made this work.
Tom Hyland: Are you from New York?
Jeremy Carr: I grew up in New Jersey, the town of Westfield, nearby New York City.
I went to school at Boston University and attended film school there.
Afterwards I moved to New York City, thinking this was going to be temporary, this will
be a pit stop on my way to Los Angeles and I ended up staying in New York for
sixteen years.
It’s just something that happened. It’s like New York has a way of
pulling you in and keeping you there.
TH: What did you do for 16 years in New York?
JC: Initially I came out of film school and I wanted to keep
making films. In school, I had made several short films. At this point, I was
shooting a film in 16mm and came out of film school and the reality was that I
had to get a job, so my first job was at Miramax. I started out as a temp at
Miramax and worked my way into a job in their post-production department. So it
gave me a sense of what was going on in the industry and how a film company
actually works. It allowed me to meet a lot of interesting filmmakers.
TH: Is that still owned by the Weinsteins? They now have their
own company, right?
JC: Right. I believe the Weinsteins sold it. I think there is
new ownership.
TH: The question that I’m sure you have been asked a lot and
will be asked a lot is “were you influenced by Taxi Driver when you made this film?” Tell me about this film. Is
any part of this autobiographical? What about the main character Ed? Is he
based on anyone you know or is he a composite of people?
JC: Sure. The impetus for the story came from my own
experiences. I lived in New York City for sixteen years and at that point, I had been
living there about eight years. It was a combination of things. One, was I kept
a journal and I would write down anecdotes about things I observed in the city.
Usually bizarre things, things that I thought were strange or surreal, or
creepy. I would collect those little anecdotes.
At the same time, I was going through a period in my life
where I was having really bad recurring nightmares. So I started researching
lucid dreaming, how to use lucid dreaming to overcome nightmares, which was a
technique that I picked up from a book called On Lucid Dreaming by Stephen LaBerge. It actually really helped me.
It helped me figure out how to become aware and conscious while I was dreaming,
and I was able to stop the bad dreams from happening.
TH: Did the dreams start in New York?
JC: Yes. Mostly I think it had to do with my general state of
paranoia of living in the city, surrounded by people all the time. Coming close
to getting mugged a couple of times. Mostly having these dangerous moments that
I compiled, but I worked through it using this dream therapy.
That’s when I started writing the screenplay. I had this
idea for a character not like me, necessarily, but going through a similar
thing I was going through, having recurring dreams and wondering what that
means. I wanted to take it to the extreme level of what if you started to think
your dreams were more than fantasies, what if they actualy signified something?
What if you had a character that was becoming unhinged and thinking that the
dreams were premonitions and were somehow important to his life, and they were
like puzzles and he needed to understand them, what they mean and what to do
about them.
So that’s where I started from and your question is about Taxi Driver. I consider myself a bit of
a cinephile and I do watch a lot of films and I went to film school and I
certainly love that movie. I would say I wasn’t super conscious… it wasn’t as
though I was writing an updated version. I felt like I thought I had a good
first draft of the script, I remember having a moment where I questioned, “is
this too much like Taxi Driver? Am I doing anything new? Is there anything new
I am bringing to the table?
What I decided what I really liked about the story was that
it did have sort of a nod to Taxi Driver,
but it felt more contemporary. The character felt different to me. The
character of Ed, unlike Travis Bickle, who was a Vietnam vet, Ed Zimmer is
college educated, he’s sort of a college dropout. But in the movie, I like this
idea of being a more educated and post-9/11 Travis Bickle, if that makes sense.
And that puts a new spin on it and obviously, once we
started filming, you start pointing the camera and you find really interesting
locations in New York City in all five boroughs. What I wanted to do was
contrast, thing such as Times Square, the Statue of Liberty and all the iconic
landmarks of NYC and contrast that with the seedier moments you might find in
the Bronx or in Brooklyn or in Staten Island. Once you start doing that and
point the camera at those places, you can’t help but feel, is this the Taxi
Driver vibe?
TH: I like the idea of having Ed be a tour guide on a bus, so
he’s everyman, so those fears and nightmares become more real. Also the fact
that he’s seen all of the city, he’s seen all the sickness; he’s not some
advertising agent working in an office on Madison Avenue.
JC: Right, well, he’s seen both sides that the tourists aren’t
seeing. And it’s through the eyes of a tour guide that he spends all day
talking to tourists, saying, “on your left is the Empire State Building and he
says “New York City is the greatest city on earth” and he repeats it as it’s a
mantra. “The greatest city on earth. The greatest city on earth.”
And then we see him go home at night. It’s anything but the
greatest city.
TH: I like how you use space, as you have that cramped
apartment where Ed can barely think as opposed to the skyscrapers of Manhattan,
although there is a certain claustrophobic effect to that as well.
It is, and NY has so many interesting locations. What I
tried to do was to frame each scene to be a reflection of Ed’s state of mind.
In large part, it’s a story about loneliness and the lonelieness of living in a
big city such as New York. And even though you’re surrounded by people, sometimes
it’s the loneliest place to be, because you’re anonymous and they’re strangers.
I wanted to show that element that Ed lives in.
TH: I love the opening shot as well, with the lightbulb flickering
in the dark apartment. It sets the tone for the film perfectly. Now when you’re
making this film, how are you hiring these actors? Are these people you had
known or were they recommended to you or did you work with a casting director?
JC: To backtrack a little bit, this is a truly independent
movie. Very small crew. Dawn Fidrick and I produced it together. It took us
eight years essentially from beginning to end. We shot for six years in the
city and we did put out ads. Six years, as people’s schedules would allow us,
as we would raise finds and shoot when we could. Then we would work day jobs.
One of the trickiest parts was keeping the continuity
straight. James (Moles, who plays Ed) was great at that, keeping his hair a
certain length. The basic part was his acting, becoming that character again
and again. Not only sustain that role for that long period of time, but we were
shooting out of order – you don’t shoot in continuity. We would talk about it a
lot when we were preparing to do a scene. He had a real knack for keeping in
mind where his character was on the arc. For example, his character is a
different personality by the end of the movie that he was at the beginning of
the movie and there’s a whole range in between. I give him credit. I didn’t know if he could do it, but James could pinpoint where he was in that spectrum. He
would ask me to remind him where that scene falls in the story so he could know
emotionally where to be at that point.
He comes from the theater, which really helps. His background
is a stage actor, so I think for him, doing that sort of mental preparation. He
likes to rehearse a lot and work on a scene.
TH: I thought that Natia Dune, who plays Lucya, was great. How
did you happen to hire her?
James had become a friend by this point, as I had seen him
do some theater work. To answer your previous question, Ed Zimmer is an amalgam
of different people, James a little bit, maybe myself a little bit. Also Crime and Punishment plays into the
story, so I wanted that Raskolnikov in the character, that sort of paranoid
Russian character and then I’ve done tons of research on true crime. It’s
something I’m fascinated with. This sort of ties in more with the kilers in the
story. Researching from everyone from Ted Bundy to Jeffrey Dahmer, pulling from
their personalities.
But Natia Dune is someone I met from doing auditions. I
auditioned 200, 300 actresses and she just rose to the top.
Jeremy Carr (Photo ©Tom Hyland)
TH: As far as Ilya Slovesnik who plays the stranger, how did that
character come about?
JC: That ties in with the Crime and Punishment angle. As you
know, Ed becomes obssessed with reading the book Crime and Punishment. When I was writing the script, I was sort of
obsessesd with Crime and Punishment
and that’s how it came into the story.
I had this idea that when Ed is reading Crime and Punishment
he would be also walking around Times Square observing things. He sees a
prostitute working on a street corner. He sees a sign in the window that says,
‘just one buck.’ All these little things that are clues to what’s going to
happen later. The film is very subtle.
It all kind of works together. In a way that he’s connecting
things and elements of Crime and
Punishment keep resurfacing in real life.
And one of the things… this character called the Insepctor
that Ilya Slovesnik played.. when I was writing it, my approach to
writing the script was that I didn’t want to follow the standard three-act
structure, like the old way of writing screenplays. Not that there’s anything
wrong with that, but I wanted to take a more novelistic approach to it. So let
me start with this character and the dilemnas he’s having and the nightmares
he’s having and doesn’t know what to do about them and let me just follow him
around and see what he does.
So the story begins with that problem and we just follow Ed
on a strange journey that just sort of meanders about. I wanted it to feel more
realistic. I kept asking myself.. I didn’t want this to be a genre, horror type
movie in the sense of having things jumping out at you to scare you. I didn’t
want to fall into those tracks. I wanted it to be more character driven than
that.
That’s how I got to the third act. I felt like we needed to
turn the pressure up a little bit. We need to have a reason why Ed would
abandon this vigliante mission he is on. I felt that the cliché would to be to
intrdocue this cop character, somebody that is trying to capture him. I felt it
would be much more interesting to have a stranger, this mysterious character
turned up and statred talking to him and stalking him. And we don’t really know
who he is and Ed doesn’t know who he is. And it would feel as though he stepped
right out of the pages of Crime and
Punishment.
Again, it ties in with this idea that Ed might be imagining
this and might not be – it might be real, it might not be real.
TH: You seem like a confident person, but were there ever
moments of doubt over the years you took to make this?
Oh, there were definite dire moments, but time was on our
side. There was no real deadline for the film. The only deadline was would the
actors stick around?
JC: Time was on our side and it also allowed me to have more
creative control. We had a studio in Brooklyn and we built the sets in there.
We could pre-light the sets, film a rehearsal of a scene and then take that
film to edit it and look at what was working, to be able to test it out. It
became a really interesting process of crafting and refining the film.
